Use of Rods to Improve Grid Safety

Use vertical rods to reduce grid resistance and voltages to improve the safety of earthing systems



This engineering guide relates to the use of SafeGrid earthing design and analysis software to IEEE Std 80 and IEC 60479.
The principles contained within this Engineering Guide apply generally to the topic of electrical earthing and grounding.

Summary of recommendations

  1. When the soil model is high-on-low resistivity use rods which penetrate into the lower layer to reduce grid resistance.
  2. Use rods at the corners of the grids where step and touch potentials are largest.
  3. It is not economical to use rods where the bottom layer soil resistivity is higher than the top layer (low-on-high).
Figure 1 Summary of recommendations

Earthing systems

An earthing system should be installed in a manner that will limit the effect of ground potential gradients to such voltage and current levels that will not endanger the safety of people or equipment under normal and under fault conditions. 
Typically the way this is achieved is by using a system of ground electrodes which form a grid a horizontally buried conductors, supplemented by a number of vertical ground rods connected to the grid.
This concept represents the prevailing practice used around the world.

Grid conductors and rods

In substations a single electrode is, by itself, inadequate in providing a safe grounding system.
In turn, when several electrodes, such as ground rods, are connected to each other and to all equipment neutrals, frames, and structures that are to be grounded, the result is essentially a grid arrangement of ground electrodes, regardless of the original objective. 
If the connecting links happen to be buried in a soil having good conductivity, this network alone may represent an excellent grounding system.
Partly for this reason, some utilities depend on the use of a grid alone.  However, under certain circumstances ground rods are of particular value.

Safe earthing systems

Under the following condition(s) it is seldom possible to install a grid with resistance so low as to assure that the rise of a ground potential will not generate surface gradients unsafe for human contact:
  1. If the magnitude of the fault current to be dissipated to the earth is high.
  2. The resistivity of the soil is high.
  3. The area over which the earth grid can be installed is small.

Use of earthing rods

Under any of the (common) condition(s) mentioned in Section 3 the hazard can be eliminated only by control of local potentials throughout the entire area. 
A system that combines a horizontal grid and a number of vertical ground rods penetrating lower soils has the following advantages:
  1.  While horizontal (grid) conductors are most effective in reducing the danger of high step and touch voltages on the earth’s surface, provided that the grid is installed in a shallow depth, sufficiently long ground rods will stabilize the performance of such a combined system.
  2. Freezing or drying of upper soil layers could vary the soil resistivity with seasons, while the resistivity of lower soil layers remains nearly constant.
  3. Rods penetrating the lower resistivity soil are far more effective in dissipating fault currents whenever a two-layer or multilayer soil is encountered and the upper soil layer has higher resistivity than the lower layers.
  4. If the rods are installed predominately along the grid perimeter in high-on-low or uniform soil conditions, the rods will considerably reduce the steep increase of the surface gradient near the peripheral meshes.

SafeGrid Example – Use of earthing rods to improve safety

Earthing rods can offer a cost effective way of reducing grid resistance and greatly improving the safety of an earthing system.  The following is a design example using the SafeGrid earthing design software to demonstrate these principles.

Earth grid model

A simple earthing grid was built using the SafeGrid grid editor.

  • More complex grids may be imported as a CAD (DXF) file.
  • High on low soil resistivity model.
Table 1 Earthing System Model Built Using SafeGrid
Figure 2. SafeGrid – Build Grid editor


Figure 3. Surface potential plot in 3D – With earthing rods installed at corners (left) maximum = 3304 V; Without earthing rods (right) maximum = 6809 V.
Figure 4. Touch potential plot in 3D – With earthing rods installed at corners (left) maximum = 1527 V; Without earthing rods (right) maximum = 5171 V.
Figure 5. Step potential plot in 3D – With earthing rods installed at corners (left) maximum = 598 V; Without earthing rods (right) maximum = 1858 V.

Without earthing rods

The following results were obtained from the simulations for the earthing system consisting only of horizontally buried conductors without earthing rods.

Earth rods installed at grid corners

The following results were obtained from the simulations for the earthing system consisting of both horizontally buried conductors and four (4) 10 m long earth rods installed at the corners.


From the simulations using SafeGrid software the following conclusions can be made.
The use of earthing rods at the corners of the grid to penetrate into the lower resistivity soil layer:

  • Significantly reduces the grid resistance.
  • Fault current is much more effectively dissipated away from the surface of the earth reducing surface potentials.
  • Maximum step and touch potentials are significantly reduced.




ELEK SafeGrid Earthing

See our Earthing Design software ELEK SafeGrid Earthing to learn more.